AS I wrote within the preceding Due Diligencer, I am resuming my piece at the Zobel-owned Hacienda Bigaa’s ejectment fit. Like the Zobels who owned the hacienda, the fisherman persevered in the 14-yr-old court struggle and received all of the manner from the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) of Calatagan and the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Batangas to the Court of Appeals.
Finally, the Supreme Court also ruled in opposition to the hacienda in 2010, permitting the fisherman’s heirs to keep occupying a fishing floor that the high court stated changed into no longer a part of Hacienda Bigaa.
I am additionally reporting in these days’s column the petition of the Social Security System (SSS) before the Supreme Court. However, this piece isn't always meant to prejudge the case that has already reached the high tribunal.
In the case docketed under G.R. No. 174160, the high court docket affirmed the ruling of the lower courts against Hacienda Bigaa’s petition to eject Epifanio Chavez from 2,000 hectares that the Zobels had annexed to their belongings.
Ayala y Cia and/or Alfonso, Jacobo and Enrique Zobel were identified in courtroom filings as the proprietors of Hacienda Bigaa.
In May 2001, Hacienda Bigaa appealed to the excessive courtroom, which subsequently ruled towards it, after it lost on the Court of Appeals, which affirmed “in toto” the rulings of the Calatagan’s MTC and Batangas’s RTC.
In short, the Zobels misplaced the case of forcible access they filed thru Hacienda Bigaa towards Epifanio Chavez, who did not live long sufficient to achieve justice on his side. He was changed as defendant by way of Santiago Chavez within the attraction filed with the aid of Hacienda Bigaa before the high court docket.
Finally, the Supreme Court also ruled in opposition to the hacienda in 2010, permitting the fisherman’s heirs to keep occupying a fishing floor that the high court stated changed into no longer a part of Hacienda Bigaa.
I am additionally reporting in these days’s column the petition of the Social Security System (SSS) before the Supreme Court. However, this piece isn't always meant to prejudge the case that has already reached the high tribunal.
In the case docketed under G.R. No. 174160, the high court docket affirmed the ruling of the lower courts against Hacienda Bigaa’s petition to eject Epifanio Chavez from 2,000 hectares that the Zobels had annexed to their belongings.
Ayala y Cia and/or Alfonso, Jacobo and Enrique Zobel were identified in courtroom filings as the proprietors of Hacienda Bigaa.
In May 2001, Hacienda Bigaa appealed to the excessive courtroom, which subsequently ruled towards it, after it lost on the Court of Appeals, which affirmed “in toto” the rulings of the Calatagan’s MTC and Batangas’s RTC.
In short, the Zobels misplaced the case of forcible access they filed thru Hacienda Bigaa towards Epifanio Chavez, who did not live long sufficient to achieve justice on his side. He was changed as defendant by way of Santiago Chavez within the attraction filed with the aid of Hacienda Bigaa before the high court docket.
No comments:
Post a Comment