SSS’s petition
While Hacienda Bigaa misplaced its case of forcible access in opposition to Chavez all the way to the excessive courtroom, the SSS remains mired in what might be a protracted prison struggle through going to the Supreme Court.
As keeper of the contributions of 34 million member-workers and dispenser of the month-to-month pensions of retirees, SSS noted as respondents Pasay City RTC Judge Gina Bibat-Palamos for her ruling towards it, and the National Grid Corp. Of the Philippines (NGCP) for “expropriating” its property.
Bibat-Palamos, SSS stated, no longer simplest granted NGCP a “Writ of Possession” but even defined its courtroom submitting as “a mere scrap of paper.”
There is a similarity within the legal warfare waged via the SSS and Hacienda Bigaa, as each were losers inside the decrease courts.
The big difference lies of their respective petitions. The SSS questioned NGCP’s “expropriation” and valuation of its property. It additionally asked the high court docket if, being a non-public employer, NGCP has the right to expropriate government assets.
Hacienda Bigaa sued Chavez for forcible access into its extended belongings and lost. In figuring out in opposition to it, high court dominated that the two,000-hectare expansion of the hacienda became part of public area.
While Hacienda Bigaa misplaced its case of forcible access in opposition to Chavez all the way to the excessive courtroom, the SSS remains mired in what might be a protracted prison struggle through going to the Supreme Court.
As keeper of the contributions of 34 million member-workers and dispenser of the month-to-month pensions of retirees, SSS noted as respondents Pasay City RTC Judge Gina Bibat-Palamos for her ruling towards it, and the National Grid Corp. Of the Philippines (NGCP) for “expropriating” its property.
Bibat-Palamos, SSS stated, no longer simplest granted NGCP a “Writ of Possession” but even defined its courtroom submitting as “a mere scrap of paper.”
There is a similarity within the legal warfare waged via the SSS and Hacienda Bigaa, as each were losers inside the decrease courts.
The big difference lies of their respective petitions. The SSS questioned NGCP’s “expropriation” and valuation of its property. It additionally asked the high court docket if, being a non-public employer, NGCP has the right to expropriate government assets.
Hacienda Bigaa sued Chavez for forcible access into its extended belongings and lost. In figuring out in opposition to it, high court dominated that the two,000-hectare expansion of the hacienda became part of public area.
No comments:
Post a Comment